Montana’s New law Banning Climate Impact Sparks Backlash?

Montana’s new law banning climate impact reviews has sparked backlash from environmental experts and advocates. The law, which was signed into effect by Governor Greg Gianforte on May 10, 2023, prohibits state agencies from considering the potential impacts of climate change when evaluating large projects.

Critics of the law say it will make it more difficult to protect Montana’s environment from the effects of climate change, which include more extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and changes in plant and animal life. They also argue that the law is out of step with the scientific consensus on climate change, which is that human activity is the primary cause of the problem.

Supporters of the law say it is necessary to protect Montana’s economy from the costs of climate regulations. They argue that the law will help to create jobs and attract businesses to Montana.

The law is likely to face legal challenges. The Sierra Club has already filed a lawsuit challenging the law, and other environmental groups are expected to follow suit.

The outcome of the legal challenges is uncertain, but HB 971 is a sign of the growing political divide over climate change. The law is a victory for Republicans who have been skeptical of climate science and who have opposed efforts to address climate change. The law is a setback for environmental groups who have been working to protect Montana’s environment from the impacts of climate change.

A Husband hid $500,000 in Bitcoin during a Divorce in New York – Breaking Techno News

Here are some of the reactions to the Montana’s new law:

  • “This law is a reckless attack on Montana’s air, water, and public health,” said Jill Tidman, executive director of the Sierra Club’s Montana Chapter. “It will make it harder to protect our communities from the impacts of climate change, which are already being felt in Montana.”
  • “This law is a slap in the face to Montanans who are concerned about the impacts of climate change,” said Mike Bader, executive director of the Montana Environmental Information Center. “It will make it harder to protect our state’s air, water, and wildlife from the impacts of climate change.”
  • “This law is a victory for Montana’s economy,” said Tom Liverty, president of the Montana Chamber of Commerce. “It will help to create jobs and attract businesses to Montana.”

The law is likely to have a significant impact on Montana’s environment and economy. It will make it more difficult to protect Montana’s environment from the impacts of climate change, and it could lead to job losses in the clean energy sector. However, the law could also help to attract businesses to Montana that are looking to avoid climate regulations.

The outcome of the legal challenges is uncertain, but HB 971 is a sign of the growing political divide over climate change. The law is a victory for Republicans who have been skeptical of climate science and who have opposed efforts to address climate change. The law is a setback for environmental groups who have been working to protect Montana’s environment from the impacts of climate change.

What is ‘Brain Eating Amoebas’? New Concern in US: Health Officials Advise – Global Science News

Here are some of the specific criticisms that have been leveled against the law:

  • The law is based on the false premise that climate change is not a serious problem.
  • The law will make it more difficult to protect Montana’s environment from the effects of climate change.
  • The law is out of step with the scientific consensus on climate change.
  • The law is a giveaway to special interests, such as the fossil fuel industry.

Montana’s New Climate Law Explain?

Montana’s new climate law, House Bill 971, was signed into law by Governor Greg Gianforte on May 10, 2023. The law prohibits state agencies from considering climate change when permitting large projects.

HB 971 amends the Montana Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) to prohibit state agencies from considering greenhouse gas emissions and climate impacts when conducting environmental reviews for large projects. The law defines a “large project” as one that requires a state permit and has a total cost of at least $10 million. Read More

Leave a Reply

Germany Apologizes for Colonial Crimes in Tanzania Explain – World Eye News What would the UK be like without a Monarchy? World Eye News Germany’s Recession Would Trigger Global Recession – World Eye News There are 4 ways India can get POK back – World Eye News Who would benefit if China collapsed? – World Eye News
Germany Apologizes for Colonial Crimes in Tanzania Explain – World Eye News What would the UK be like without a Monarchy? World Eye News Germany’s Recession Would Trigger Global Recession – World Eye News There are 4 ways India can get POK back – World Eye News Who would benefit if China collapsed? – World Eye News
Germany Apologizes for Colonial Crimes in Tanzania Explain – World Eye News What would the UK be like without a Monarchy? World Eye News Germany’s Recession Would Trigger Global Recession – World Eye News There are 4 ways India can get POK back – World Eye News Who would benefit if China collapsed? – World Eye News
%d bloggers like this: